Faragiri

Learn PinyinChinese

Every letter has exactly one value and several are not the ones an English reader assumes, so a week of skimming installs sounds you practise for a year.

6Sections
6Min read
3Depth

What each letter is doing

Letters that behave, letters that lie, and letters that are conventions

The columns are ordered by how much trouble each group causes, and the third one is not about sounds at all.

  1. Says what you expect3
    • b, d, g, m, n, l
    • f, s, w, y
    • a, o, and most of the endings
  2. Says something else5
    • q, near the ch of cheese
    • x, a hiss in the same place
    • c, the ts of cats
    • zh, the j of judge with the tongue curled
    • r, neither an English r nor a zh
  3. A spelling convention3
    • i, with three different values
    • u after j, q, x, y, which is really the umlauted one
    • The tone mark, dropped almost everywhere in the wild

The third column is where the quiet damage is. Those are not letters saying the wrong sound, they are letters standing for different sounds in different places, so a learner who has one rule for them is wrong a fixed proportion of the time and never notices which.

Pinyin is a precise system and it was designed for people who already spoke Chinese. Every letter has exactly one value and several of those values are not the ones an English reader will assume, so a beginner who reads pinyin as though it were English installs four or five wrong sounds in the first week and then practises them for a year.

Half an hour spent on the letters that do not say what they look like is the cheapest half hour in this entire subject. It is also almost never spent, because pinyin looks like the easy part and gets skimmed.

Six things pinyin does not tell an English reader

Pinyin is a precise system and it was not designed for English speakers. Six letters mislead badly and are worth correcting on day one.

  • q, x and zh are not what they look like. q is roughly ch made with the tongue forward, x is a soft sh in the same position, and zh is a j made with the tongue curled back.
  • c is ts, as at the end of cats, so cai begins with a ts sound and not a k.
  • ian is closer to yen than to the vowel the spelling suggests, which catches every beginner reading a name.
  • ü appears after n and l, where it must be written, and it is dropped after j, q and x because no ambiguity is possible there.
  • the tone mark goes on the vowel, and where there are several it follows a fixed order, so the mark is always findable.
  • pinyin is a tool, not the language. It is how characters are typed and how children are taught to read, and no adult text is written in it.

The letters that mean something else

Four are notorious and they are the ones every course warns about. The letter q is not a k sound at all; it is close to the ch of cheese but made further forward. The letter x is not a ks; it is a hissing sound made in the same place. The letter c is a ts, as at the end of cats. And zh is roughly the j of judge, made with the tongue curled back.

The ones nobody warns about are more interesting and cost more, because they are vowels and vowels are in every syllable. The letter i has three completely different values depending on what precedes it: an ee sound in most syllables, and two quite different buzzing sounds after zh, ch, sh, r and after z, c, s. The letter e on its own is not the e of bed. And the umlauted u is written as a plain u after j, q, x and y, which means the same letter is two different vowels depending on the consonant in front of it, and nothing marks the difference.

The tone marks are the last piece and they are dropped constantly in the wild: on menus, in messages, in names, in transliterated place names. A learner who has stored words with the tone written only in the pinyin has stored words that will arrive without it.

The week one skim, and the year of practising it wrong

Here is the stall and it is a scheduling error rather than a difficulty. Pinyin is taught in the first fortnight, alongside a great deal else, and it looks like an alphabet rather than a system, so it gets read once and used from then on. Every subsequent word is read through whatever values were absorbed in that fortnight.

Nothing corrects it, because pinyin is a tool rather than a subject and no exercise ever comes back to it. So a learner can be two years in, reading fluently, and still saying an English x where a Chinese x belongs, and the error is in every word containing one. The exit is to go back deliberately, once, with audio, and check every syllable value against a recording rather than against your memory of week two. It takes an afternoon and almost nobody does it, which is a good description of most of the highest return work in this pillar.

What gets warned about

The famous traps, and the ones nobody mentions

Everything below the line is a vowel, and vowels are in every syllable, which is why the lower half costs more over a year.

  • q is not a kWarned about in every course and fixed in an hour
  • x is not a ksSame warning, same afternoon
  • zh, ch, sh are curled backMentioned, and usually approximated
What a first lesson covers
  • i has three valuesDepending entirely on the consonant before it
  • u is sometimes the umlauted vowelAfter j, q, x and y, with nothing marking it
  • e alone is not the e of bedAnd it changes again inside a compound ending
  • The tone mark goes missingMenus, messages, names, place names
  • Syllable boundaries inside a wordWhere an apostrophe is required and often omitted

The waterline marks what a first lesson covers rather than a measured proportion. The lower items share one property: none of them produces an obviously wrong sound, so nothing about saying them incorrectly ever feels like an error.

Two things that give you the sound rather than the letter

A pinyin syllable chart with audio is the object to work through. Mandarin has a limited set of possible syllables, so the chart is finite and a recording exists for every cell of it. It replaced learning the values from a description in a textbook, which cannot convey a sound and which is where the wrong values come from in the first place. Free versions are widely available, and the point is to click every cell rather than the ones you are unsure about, since the dangerous ones are the ones you are not unsure about.

The second is your own reading, recorded and compared against the chart. Read a paragraph of pinyin aloud, record it, then play the chart's version of the syllables you were least careful with. It replaced assuming the reading was right because it felt right, which it will, because the values being used are the ones you have always used. Free, and the comparison is the whole tool: hearing yourself alone tells you nothing, since you hear what you intended.

The mistake: treating pinyin as a spelling of Chinese

Pinyin is a transcription of sounds, not a spelling of words, and the difference shows up in two places. It records the syllable and it does not record the character, so a pinyin syllable corresponds to many different words and a learner reading pinyin-only material is reading something genuinely ambiguous. And it is not used by adult native speakers to read anything: it exists for teaching, for dictionaries and for typing.

Which means pinyin is scaffolding with a scheduled removal date. Leaning on it past the first few months produces a learner who reads Chinese through a Roman intermediary, which is slower than reading characters and gets slower as the material gets harder. Set the date early and move to characters as the primary form, which is radicals, components, and how to remember a few thousand.

What pinyin does and does not record

It records the syllable and the tone, and the tone is the part most often lost in transmission, which is four of them, and what happens when you get one wrong. It records nothing at all about which word is meant, and Mandarin has enough homophones that this matters constantly, which is two character words, and guessing the meaning of a new one. It is what you will type to produce characters, so it stays useful long after it stops being read. And the gap between reading a syllable correctly and catching it in a sentence is hearing tone at conversational speed. The general point, that an hour spent on a foundation early is worth a year of correction later, is the scheduling argument in turning a vague intention into hours on a calendar.

Alongside this

Above this